Perceived versus advertised social referent recognition and you will partnership commitment and you will dedication

Spouse choice from inside the internet dating

Felmlee, D. H. (2001). Off attractive to terrible: Disenchantment having an intimate spouse. Sociological Viewpoints, 44, 263-280. [ Backlinks ]

Fiore, A beneficial. T., & Donath, J. (2005). Homophily during the internet dating: When can you such as anyone instance yourself? CHI, fulfilling into the person items in measuring solutions. 1317-1374. [ Website links ]

Furman, W. (1985)patibility and incompatibility from inside the kids’ peer and you will cousin relationship. When you look at the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationship (pp. 61-87). Ny: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Hyperlinks ]

Gattis, K. S., Berns, S., Simpson, L. E., & Christensen, A. (2004). Birds regarding good feather or unusual birds? Links one of identity proportions, similarity, and you will ily Psychology, cuatro, 564-574. [ Hyperlinks ]

Gaunt, R. (2006). Partners similarity and you may marital satisfaction: Try equivalent partners happy. Diary from Identification, 74, 1401-1420. [ Backlinks ]

Goffman, E. (1952). Towards the cooling the prospective aside: Certain element of variation in order to incapacity. Psychiatry, fifteen, 451-463. [ Links ]

Gonzaga, Grams. C., Campos, B., & Bradbury, T. (2007). Resemblance, overlap, and you may matchmaking satisfaction into the relationship and you will married people. Record regarding Personality and Public Psychology, 93, 34-48. [ Links ]

Private Matchmaking, fifteen, 281-295

Hatfield, Elizabeth., & Sprecher, S. (1986). Reflect, mirror: The necessity of appears within the everyday life. Albany: State College or university of the latest York Push. [ Backlinks ]

Hatfield, Age., & Sprecher, S. (2009). Coordinating theory. During the H. T. Reis & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Encyclopedia from person dating (Vol. 2, pp. 10651067). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. [ Website links ]

Hatfield, E., Traupmann, J., Sprecher, S., Utne, M., & Existe, J. (1985). Guarantee and you may romantic interactions: Present search. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationship (pp. 91-117). New york: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Hyperlinks ]

Hitsch, G. J., Hortacsu, A beneficial., & Ariely, D. (2010). Matching and you may sorting when . . . . . . you look at the internet dating. American Financial Comment, 100, 130-163. [ Links ]

Houran, J., Lange, R., Rentfrow, J. P., & Bruckner, K. H. (2004). Perform on line relationship evaluation works? An evaluation off original proof getting an advertised ‘predictive make of erican Diary off Mindset, six, 507-526. [ Hyperlinks ]

Houts, R. Meters., Robins, Age., & Huston, T. L. träffa Dominikaner kvinnor (1996)patibility and growth of preily, 58, 7-20. [ Website links ]

Huston, T., Niehuis, S., & Smith, S. (2001). Early marital root regarding conjugal worry and you will divorce. Current Rules for the Mental Science, ten, 116-119. [ Backlinks ]

Ickes, W. (1985). Introduction. Within the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 1-7). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]

Ickes, W., & Charania, M. Roentgen. (2009)patibility. When you look at the H. T. Reis & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Encyclopedia away from human dating (Vol. 1, pp. 283-286). Newbury Playground, CA: Sage. [ Links ]

Kalick, S. Yards., & Hamilton III, T. Age. (1986). Brand new coordinating theory reexamined. Log off Personality and you can Societal Psychology, 51 , 673-682. [ Links ]

Karney, B. Roentgen., & Bradbury, T. Letter. (1995). The fresh new longitudinal course of relationship top quality and you can balances: A look at principle, methods, and you will look. Mental Bulletin, 118, 3-34. [ Backlinks ]

Karney, B. Roentgen., & Bradbury, T. Letter. (1997). Neuroticism, marital telecommunications, together with trajectory off marital fulfillment. Diary out of Identity and you can Societal Mindset, 72, 1075-1092. [ Links ]

Karney, B. Roentgen., & Bradbury, T. N. (2005). Contextual impacts into the relationship: Implications to possess rules and you can intervention. Newest Recommendations within the Emotional Science, fourteen, 171-174. [ Links ]

Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, Age., Christensen, A beneficial., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, Grams. Peterson, D.R. (1983). Analyzing close dating. During the H. H. Kelley, Elizabeth. Berscheid, A. Christensen, J. H. Harvey, T. L. Huston, G. Levinger. D. R. Peterson (Eds.), Romantic relationships (pp. 20-67). Nyc: Freeman. [ Links ]